Say What?


Today we are going to Muse about what you say and how you say it.  If this is your first visit, welcome to Musings. If you have been here before, welcome back. Over time we are going to talk about many things: the past, the present, perhaps the future, travel, art, society and more. Wherever my musing takes me. I hope you will come along with me. Click to check out my artwork

Colored text is a link.  Clicking on the text will provide additional information about the subject.

Say What?



Last night I was watching the news and I began to focus on the language as it was being spoken.  Newscasters whose basic function is to communicate were setting the bar very low.

One of the stories being highlighted was about three young women who had been rescued in Ohio after being abducted nine, ten and thirteen years ago.  Over and over the newscaster used the phrase, “When they first disappeared . . . “  Doesn’t that bother you?    Would it not be better to say “When they disappeared . . . “?  How many times did they disappear?

I makes me think of people who say “When I first got  married . . . .”

Two other commentators instructed the viewers to “Take a listen”.  Say what?  How about “listen”?

Have you ever really thought about the sergeant who yells out “Listen up, men” or the mother who scolds, “Listen here, young man”.  Have you ever listened down or listened left?  How about listened back?  Or, listened over there?  Whatever happened to “Listen”?

This mangling of the language is an evolution.  Recently the word “disrespected” came into vogue.  “He disrespected me”.  I had never heard such a thing.  I would have said,  “He showed me disrespect.” or “He did not respect me”.   Grammatically the phrase, “He disrespected me” seems correct, but to me it sounds ignorant.

Old English Alphabet

Old English Alphabet

This change in the language has been going on for a long time.  There was not even an agreed upon alphabet until 1580.  In Old English it had been the abecede.  Spelling was not consisent.  Take the name “Shakespeare”.  According to Henry Hitchings, the author of The Language Wars, you can find it written many ways:  Shakspere, Shaxper, Shackspeare, Shexpere and many more.

Silent "k"

Silent “k”

The English Spelling Society started in 1908 (as the Simplified Spelling Society), and has the aim of raising awareness of the problems caused by the irregularity of English spelling and to promote remedies to improve literacy, including spelling reform.  It  is still in existence and you can go on the society website:

One of the articles on the site reads as follows:

A brief history of English spelling

The first English writing system using the Roman alphabet was developed in the 7th century, after St. Augustine brought church Latin to the Saxons in Kent in 597. The language and spelling have both changed a great deal since then. They did not start to resemble current usage until 1348, when a series of plagues helped to end French domination over England and the English language. The system from which current English spelling conventions have developed was the one used by the poet Geoffrey Chaucer, who died in 1400.

Sadly, the orthography he used began to be diluted even during his lifetime. English became re-instated as the official language of England around 1430, after the 100 years war with France ended, and many of the scribes and clerks of court, who had hitherto written only French or Latin, had trouble switching to it. Their difficulties are chiefly responsible for most of the still surviving French spellings in words of French origin (table, double, centre) and spelling inconsistencies, such as ‘label – table’, ‘bubble – double’, ‘enter – centre’. Most words of French descent have been respellt to show their changed, anglicised pronunciation (e.g. ‘beef, battle, budge, count, government, mountain’ – from ‘boeuf, bouger, bataille, compter, gouvernement, montagne’), or respelt unfathomably (peuple – people).

Chaucer’s spelling system became even more seriously corrupted after 1476, when Caxton returned to London after 30 years on the Continent, to set up the first English printing press. To help him in this enterprise, he brought with him printers from Belgium who spoke little or no English and therefore made numerous spelling errors (e.g. ‘any, busy, citie’ for ‘eny, bisy, cittie’).

They were also paid by the line and fond of lengthening words to earn more money, or to make margins look neater. Many words with earlier simpler spellings became more complex and longer (frend – friend, hed – head, seson – season; fondnes – fondnesse, bad – badde, shal – shall).

The biggest dilution of English spelling patterns, however, occurred in the 16th century, during the printing of the first English bibles. They were printed abroad, because English bishops supported the Pope’s ban on translating the holy writ from Latin into native languages. After Martin Luther’s public questioning of the Pope’s infallibility in 1517 in Germany, many English people began to want to know exactly what the bible said, instead of just hearing about it from priests in their Sunday sermons. William Tyndale translated it, but he had to leave England to do so.

Tyndale lived in hiding, moving between Germany, Holland and Belgium, because spies in the employ of Sir Thomas More were constantly trying to track him down. His writings were therefore also printed abroad by people who spoke no English.

They were also much reprinted, because English bishops kept having them searched out, bought up and brought back for public burning outside St. Paul’s cathedral in London. With repeated copying, from increasingly corrupt copies, bible spellings became more and more varied. Yet they were the first and only book that many families ever bought, and learned to read and write from too.

When Sir Thomas More’s spies finally managed to track Tyndale down and have him hanged and then burnt at the stake near Brussels in 1536, printers began to change his spellings even more, along with his name, in order to disguise his authorship. By the second half of the 16thcentury English spelling had consequently become very chaotic, with hardly anyone knowing what its rules were. Elizabethan manuscripts consequently became full of different spellings for identical words, on the same page, even including the Queen’s own writings and the first authorised bible of 1611.

The spelling mess created during the first 100 years of English printing, mainly by foreign printers without any knowledge of English, led to calls for the standardisation of English spelling. The first steps towards this were taken by teachers who began to compile spelling lists for their pupils. One of them, Edmond Coote, published his in 1595 and called it ‘The English Schoolemaister’. It saved others the trouble, became very popular and also highly influential.

Coote cut many surplus letters inserted by printers (e.g. hadde – had, worde – word). He was greatly assisted by the pamphleteers of the English Civil War (1642-9) who liked words to be shorter in order to pack as much information onto a page as possible.

Unfortunately, they did not get rid of all surplus letters, and most of those which escaped their 17th C culling survive still (e.g. have, well, fuss, friend, build). Coote also paid no heed to the regularity of English spelling or ease of mastering it. His main aim was to help establish a single spelling for each word, opting for the one most often used.

When Samuel Johnson began work on his famous dictionary of 1755, quite a few English words still had more than one spelling, such as ‘there, there, thare, their’. He decided to link several hundred alternative spellings to differences in meaning, as was already beginning to happen, and thereby helped to make learning to spell English even more difficult. Mercifully, he did not apply this to at least 2000 others, such as ‘arm/arme, mean/mene’.

I find all this interesting.  I just disrespect a person who when he first got married told his bride to listen up.

More to come

If you like Musings, take a moment and click the subscription button on the side-bar to the right so you will be notified by e-mail when I make a new post.


Books by Thomas L. Tribby Available
Click on title below to preview

Works on Paper

On The Waterfront

Impressions of Florida

Tribbyart’s Boutique



New Limited Edition Croquet Prints

Waiting for Turn
Waiting for Turn 

Click to see

The Watched Shot
The Watched Shot
Click to see
Black for the Wicket
Black for the Wicket

Click to See

The Gallery
The Gallery 

Click to see



About Thomas L. Tribby

Professional artist: painter, sculptor, print maker. Maintains a studio in West Palm Beach, Florida
This entry was posted in art, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s